It may seem a little weird, but every time a player I really like takes the trophy at the finals of a Grand Slam, I get teary eyed. I can't help but laugh and cry in delight; a satisfaction for a tourney well done.
When Serena Williams won her second straight US Open (and fifth overall), it wasn't exactly waterworks, but I was relieved and thrilled that she regrouped and pulled off a definitive third set to secure the win.
|Williams has earned over $9million in prize money this year alone.|
I know that sports is a multi-billion dollar business. I am aware that athletes in their own way are entertainers and they too receive millions for what they do. I understand that her check from the United States Tennis Association is for winning the entire tourney, but it upsets me that we have this amount of money to award to someone who plays a game.
|Williams is now tied with Everett with 18 Grand Slam titles.|
So why the confusion? Why the complaint about $2.6 million dollars. I just don't understand the law of economics. Somewhere along the way, we decided it was okay to pay our athletes millions as prize money and exponentially more for branding. I know I can't do a single thing about the fact that Tiger Woods makes more money in one round of golf than a worker in Jakarta who has been subcontracted by Nike will make in his or her entire life, but it still upsets me. It blows my mind that there is that much money to extend and yet there is great need. Dire need. It is my conscience qualm.
I can hear the retorts now...he's the very best as what he does...but it still leaves me uncomfortable. Fortunately, my question is not in vain. In the article, "Good Sport" Luke Hansen, SJ writes:
Maybe at one time sports fans could simply enjoy the helmet-smashing hits and record-breaking home runs and look the other way when our favorite team benefited. Those days are over. This raises important questions: Is it enough for me to be a passive consumer, simply looking for entertainment, with little concern for the internal business of these sports? Or must I now become a more conscientious and responsible consumer? Sports are big business, of course—the N.F.L. brings in more than $9 billion annually, and baseball is close behind ($7 billion)—and fans drive this machine by spending big bucks on game tickets and team apparel and by sending television ratings and advertising revenues through the roof.
Do fans have the power to help shape professional sports? Remember the swift resolution of the labor dispute between the N.F.L. and its locked-out officials in September 2012. In a nationally televised “Monday Night Football” game, replacement referees affected the outcome with a botched call on the final play. Fans decided they had had enough. That night the league office reportedly received 70,000 voice mail messages demanding an end to the lockout. Within 48 hours, league officials and the referees reached a tentative agreement, and the regular referees were back on the field.
This mass action makes me wonder what else might be possible if sports fans become genuinely concerned about player safety and are willing to do something about it or are able to channel their outrage constructively over the continued use of P.E.D.’s.I have a hard time believing anyone is going to rally around paying professional athletes a just and fair wage. I know it's market driven. But it's another question worth considering within the wide world of sports.
In the meantime, I hope Serena enjoys the $1 million dollar bonus she received for winning the US Open as Emirates Airline US Open Series champion.